An assumption about the farm can be that it will start off good but it won’t end well. I don’t believe that a lot of the animals are going to stay faithful and true to the animal farm. Some might trade on each other. The leader might trade on some of them too I don’t know. I am just going to have to read some more of the book. I believe that they will use the power that they can read and write in a harmful way. It might not be harmful at first but in the end it will be. They will take advantage of the fact that they can read and write.

            I wouldn’t vote for neither of them but if I had to choose one I would say Napoleon. It seems like he knows what to do. He knows what the farm needs. He is prepared for an attack at any time and that is a good thing. He is a better leader than Snowball because Snowball isn’t friendly but he isn’t like hardcore as a leader like Napoleon. Napoleon’s plan would benefit the farm the most because he know then need food technology and stuff like that. I really don’t think Snowball broke the windmill but that’s what they say. I think they were just trying to blame it on someone and blamed it on him.

            I believe that Orwell the writer of Animal Farm is trying to send a message that the rulers didn’t take any mess what they wanted to do is what they wanted to do and nobody was going to stop them. If somebody tried to step in the way he would probably kill them. In the book everyone thought that the commandment said “No animal kills another animal” when it actually said “No animal kills another animal without reason and they say that all the animals probably forgot that part at the end but I think it was somebody that added that after the killing. The Russian Revolution was ruled by the leaders and they thought that nobody could defeat them when they really were defeated.